Re: Unicode support
От | Miguel Juan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unicode support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001101c5aece$a182d850$07c8a8c0@Miguel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Unicode support ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
hello, I will try it with BDE environment if you want. Regards, Miguel Juan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> To: "Anoop Kumar" <anoopk@pervasive-postgres.com> Cc: <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:36 PM Subject: [ODBC] Unicode support Hi Anoop and anyone else who might be interested, I've been thinking about how the Unicode support might be improved to allow the old 07.xx non-unicode style behaviour to work for those that need it. At them moment, when we connect using on of the wide connect functions, the CC->unicode flag is set to true. This only affects a few options, such as pgtype_to_concise_type()'s mapping of PG types to SQL types. It seems to me that perhaps we should set CC->unicode = 1, only upon connection to a Unicode database. Anything else, we leave it set to 0 so that it always maps varchars etc to ANSI types, and handles other encodings in single byte or non-unicode multibyte mode (which worked fine in 07.xx where those encodings where appropriate, such as SJIS in Japan). This should also help BDE based apps, which further research has shown me are broken with Unicode columns in SQL Server and Oracle as well as PostgreSQL (search unicode + BDE on Google Groups for more). Am I seeing a possible improvement where in fact there isn't one, or missing some obvious downside? Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: