Re: [GENERAL] Newbie questions
От | K.T. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Newbie questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000e01beb239$92b3f5e0$2b9264d1@p2-400-death обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
From: Scott Alexander <scott.alexander@mindspring.com> To: pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org> Date: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 5:57 PM Subject: [GENERAL] Newbie questions >Database design - CASE tools >============================ >For people who *don't* use a CASE tool: what do you find to be the most >efficient method of defining your database schema? The lack of user friendly interfaces is one of the reasons why I choose not to develop large (> 60 tables) databses in PostgreSQl...but when I do develop I simply save the SQL stmts in a text file so I can reuse them to recreate the database at any time. >Additional SQL features >======================= >referential integrity, and automatic two-phase commit. (Borland's >Interbase 5.5 is a good example which incorporates all these features.) Ugg Interbase :) Lets not go there :) PostgreSQL supports Triggers, Stored Procedures, Rollback, and autocommit. Referential Integrity is not yet working. I leave it to others to itemize all the other nifty features :)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: