Re: Possible problem when two clients update the same record?
От | Sean Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible problem when two clients update the same record? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000801c58f93$f1a9f8e0$6401a8c0@WATSON обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Possible problem when two clients update the same record? (Karsten Hoffrath <maillists@khoffrath.de>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Karsten Hoffrath" <maillists@khoffrath.de> To: <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 10:27 AM Subject: [NOVICE] Possible problem when two clients update the same record? > Hi all. > > I'm converting a dos based application using DBase files to PostgresSQL. > The application is a pawn shop system. > > The dos application works as follows: > Table A holds all items which the customers bring to the shop. > Table B has one record for each day which holds the totals (pieces, > costs, etc.) for this particular day. > When B is updated, the particular record gets locked, updated and > released. > > The new application works this way: > - start a new transaction, > - insert the new record in A, > - the insert operation fires a trigger which updates B > - the transaction is committed. > > Now my question: > What happens if two clients insert a new record to A at the same time? > Will B get updated correctly or will one value get lost? I can't see a reason why one value would get lost. There will be two transactions, each independent of the other. I'm not sure about what would lead to a deadlock in this case, but I would think that would be pretty unlikely, as the insert operation and update to B will take milliseconds at most. B is not locked during the entire transaction, as you describe it above, I think. Sean
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: