> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On
> Behalf Of Yutaka tanida
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 03:41:12 +0200 (CEST)
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > Can somebody confirm how the executable extensions behave on
> > Windows/Cygwin? It seems that the following is true:
> >
> > cc -o foo ...
> >
> > creates a file `foo.exe'.
> >
> > cc -o foo.exe ...
> >
> > also creates a file `foo.exe'. Is that correct?
>
> Yes.
>
> > It also seems that the make targets need to be written like
> >
> > pg_passwd$(X):
> >
> > rather than
> >
> > pg_passwd:
> >
> > because otherwise you're not really updating the target of the rule.
>
> I agreed this.
Hmm,I see the following in my environment.
bash-2.02$ ls
CVS Makefile pg_passwd.c pg_passwd.o
bash-2.02$ make pg_passwd
gcc -o pg_passwd
pg_passwd.o -lcrypt -lm -lreadline -ltermcap -lncurses -lcygipc
-g
bash-2.02$ ls
CVS Makefile pg_passwd.c pg_passwd.exe pg_passwd.o
bash-2.02$ make pg_passwd
make: `pg_passwd' is up to date.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp