RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
От | Taral |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000501be006f$4bd0d660$3b291f0a@taral обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call? ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Err.. umm... Updated 10/25 17:05 CST. The following tests fail on my system (RH 5.1 - glibc): int2, int4: Different error format (Math result not representable is now Numerical result out of range) float8: Weird... one query that was supposed to fail returned a bunch of NaNs, another failed when it wasn't supposed to with an out of range error. geometry: The results are only approximately right... but only in the first sig. figure :( datetime: CDT/CST thing sanity_check: **backend aborts** random: Fails because it returns a value outside the 80-120 range misc: Rows out of order I'm afraid this one can't go as 'supported'. Sorry. Taral > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Thomas G. > Lockhart > Sent: Sunday, October 25, 1998 4:58 PM > To: Taral > Cc: Terry Mackintosh; PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call? > > > > I compiled it on RH 5.1... no problems. > > OK. Just to be unambiguous, I'd prefer a statement that includes "... > and passed all regression tests". It did, right? > > - Tom >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: