RE: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree.
| От | Stupor Genius |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 000401be6ce1$356c8b60$c298accf@darren обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] tutorial won't compile in current tree.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com> writes: > > It seems to be snagging on 'char16'. > > IIRC, char16 was deleted in 6.4 or maybe earlier (along with the other > special "charN" type names). "char(16)" is the accepted spelling now. > > A quick glimpse shows an awful lot of appearances of "char16" > in the contrib area, as well as the tutorial and some residual > uses in the documentation. Sigh. I guess that stuff is not > exercised as regularly as it oughta be. It was...I removed all references to the char16 type in the tutorial and documentation when I removed the type itself. Did someone accidentally commit it back with some other patch? Darren
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: