Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
От | Christopher Sawtell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00030116295801.01591@berty обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 01 Mar 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com> writes: > > I vote for the SQL92 TEMPORARY. Let's not add a keyword that is non-standard > > just because one or another commercial database makes use of it, > > You're missing the point: we are not talking about *adding* a keyword, > we're talking about *removing* one that we've already supported for > a year or so. That changes matters considerably, IMHO. > > I have in fact been able to make a conflict-free grammar in which TEMP > is accepted but not reserved. It requires a certain amount of > redundancy in the productions (see below), but I think this is a > worthwhile tradeoff for not breaking existing user code. > > Shall I commit this? Is there not also the possibility of making this a configure-time option? ./configure --temporary-table=TEMPORARY # or TEMP as you wish Default to TEMPORARY in accord with SQL 92. -- Sincerely etc., NAME Christopher Sawtell - Support Engineer - iOpen Technologies Ltd.CELL PHONE 021 257 4451ICQ UIN 45863470EMAIL chris @ iopen . co . nz, csawtell @ xtra . co . nzCNOTES ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/C/tutorials/sawtell_C.tar.gz ---->>> Please refrain from using HTML attachments in e-mails to me. <<<----
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: