TODO list / why 7.0 ?
От | Kaare Rasmussen |
---|---|
Тема | TODO list / why 7.0 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00022121082604.00287@bering обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? (Kaare Rasmussen <kar@webline.dk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Having been away for some time I'm very anxious to see that there's a 7.0 release coming very soon. I extracted the TODO list from the CVS (latest update February 9). The only really really big issue as I see it is referential integrity. This is big, I admit but why going to 7.0 for this? Or is it because it's long overdue (MSVC and stuff)? There are other things that must have taken a lot of work, only it's not mainstream the same way referential integrity is (PL/Perl and more). I had hoped to find outer joins, but look forward to the next release if it will be there. Maybe I missed something in the TODO list or in the fixed list, but I couldn't find VIEWs with UNIONs, which I understand would be solved by a rewrite of the rules system.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: