Re: HELP < 63 users
От | joek hondius |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HELP < 63 users |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000001c24f44$66fe7dc0$28884fc1@voyager обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HELP < 63 users (Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: HELP < 63 users
|
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
>Joek, > >On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:45:49PM +0200, joek hondius wrote: >> I could not find any pointer to this in the cygwin or postgresql docs >> about this. Jason Tishler noted this before in a review of why 'make >> test' (parallel) failed (one year ago). > >I don't recall the above. Please provide an URL. Somehow i could not find the original postings anymore (they where there 3 weeks ago), but thanks to google's cache: http://www.google.nl/search?q=cache:CXMBRFwDZUwC:postgresql.linux.cz/mhonarc /pgsql-ports/2001-03/msg00128.html+&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8 This is just some part of the discussion however. > >Are you referring to the following (from the README)? > > 1. make check can generate spurious regression test failures due to > overflowing the the listen() backlog queue which generates > connection refused errors. Note that make installcheck does not > have this problem since it runs all tests sequentially instead of in > large concurrent groups. > >Jason Of course i was referring to make check, not test (Ahum..), But this is not a backlog problem. Its seems to me to be a fork() to windows mapping problem. The WaitForObject() winAPI call is limited to 63. So postgreSQL really seems limited to 63 backends on cygwin. :( I'm trying to get 200 concurrent users to work. Joek
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: