RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
| От | Dave Cramer |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 000001c0fb2e$f12b7b80$0201a8c0@INSPIRON обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] (Michael Stephenson <mstephenson@tirin.openworld.co.uk>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, this is the correct approach, great advice! -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Stephenson Sent: June 22, 2001 10:42 AM To: PostgreSQL jdbc list Subject: [JDBC] Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] [snip] Wouldn't it be more elegant simply to make the ThreadLocal's static (as I'd have thought was probably the intention of the original author), this would remove the possiblity of any memory leaks in a single threaded environment, and have the same affect ultimately in a multithreaded environment? Michael Stephenson ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: