No, the text is correct. When synchronous_commit=3Doff there is a
possible delay between 'reported' transaction success and factual
saving on disk
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BB=D1=8F 2015 =D0=B3., at 15:20, amul sul <sul_amul=
@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> synchronous_commit description in document[1] :
> When off, there can be a delay between when success is reported to the cl=
ient and when the transaction is really guaranteed to be safe against a ser=
ver crash.
>
>
>
> If I am not misunderstood, I guess it should be *When on* instead of *Wh=
en off* here?
>
>
>
> [1] Doc link : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/<9.5,9.4,9.3,9.2,9.1,9.0,8.=
4>/static/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-SYNCHRONOUS-COMMIT
>
>
> Regards,
> Amul Sul
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs