Обсуждение: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
Greetings, I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal behavior, or if something might not be right. thanks
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > Greetings, > I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to > 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the > same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its > still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has > gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. > > When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just > under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in > terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that > explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there > something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? > > I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal > behavior, or if something might not be right. Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> Greetings, >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. >> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? >> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal >> behavior, or if something might not be right. > > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases.
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to > >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the > >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its > >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has > >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. > >> > >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just > >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in > >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that > >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there > >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? > >> > >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal > >> behavior, or if something might not be right. > > > > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to > > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. > > about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases. That should not take very long. Are you using link mode? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to >> >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the >> >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its >> >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has >> >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. >> >> >> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just >> >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in >> >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that >> >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there >> >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? >> >> >> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal >> >> behavior, or if something might not be right. >> > >> > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to >> > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. >> >> about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases. > > That should not take very long. Are you using link mode? Nope. The command that I used was: pg_upgrade -b /usr/pgsql-9.1/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin -d /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.2/data
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 01:06:19PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > >> >> Greetings, > >> >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to > >> >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the > >> >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its > >> >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has > >> >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. > >> >> > >> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just > >> >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in > >> >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that > >> >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there > >> >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? > >> >> > >> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal > >> >> behavior, or if something might not be right. > >> > > >> > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to > >> > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. > >> > >> about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases. > > > > That should not take very long. Are you using link mode? > > Nope. The command that I used was: > pg_upgrade -b /usr/pgsql-9.1/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin -d > /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.2/data Well, it must then copy all the data from old to new cluster --- that could take a while. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 01:06:19PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> >> >> Greetings, >> >> >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to >> >> >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the >> >> >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its >> >> >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has >> >> >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. >> >> >> >> >> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just >> >> >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in >> >> >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that >> >> >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there >> >> >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal >> >> >> behavior, or if something might not be right. >> >> > >> >> > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to >> >> > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. >> >> >> >> about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases. >> > >> > That should not take very long. Are you using link mode? >> >> Nope. The command that I used was: >> pg_upgrade -b /usr/pgsql-9.1/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin -d >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.2/data > > Well, it must then copy all the data from old to new cluster --- that > could take a while. I guess so, but its hard to tell. It was sitting for quite a while with no output.
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 01:06:19PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > >> >> >> Greetings, > >> >> >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to > >> >> >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the > >> >> >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its > >> >> >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has > >> >> >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just > >> >> >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in > >> >> >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that > >> >> >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there > >> >> >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal > >> >> >> behavior, or if something might not be right. > >> >> > > >> >> > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to > >> >> > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. > >> >> > >> >> about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases. > >> > > >> > That should not take very long. Are you using link mode? > >> > >> Nope. The command that I used was: > >> pg_upgrade -b /usr/pgsql-9.1/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin -d > >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.2/data > > > > Well, it must then copy all the data from old to new cluster --- that > > could take a while. > > I guess so, but its hard to tell. It was sitting for quite a while > with no output. It should spin through the file names as they are copied. What was the last output line before it hung? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
От
Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 01:09:19PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 01:06:19PM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> >> >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote: >> >> >> >> Greetings, >> >> >> >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to >> >> >> >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64). In my staging environment (which has the >> >> >> >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its >> >> >> >> still not done. It is making progress, so I don't think anything has >> >> >> >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just >> >> >> >> under an hour. There is admittedly about three times as much data (in >> >> >> >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x. Would that >> >> >> >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade? Or is there >> >> >> >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal >> >> >> >> behavior, or if something might not be right. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Odd. How many object/tables do you have? I have just patched 9.2 to >> >> >> > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects. >> >> >> >> >> >> about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases. >> >> > >> >> > That should not take very long. Are you using link mode? >> >> >> >> Nope. The command that I used was: >> >> pg_upgrade -b /usr/pgsql-9.1/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin -d >> >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.2/data >> > >> > Well, it must then copy all the data from old to new cluster --- that >> > could take a while. >> >> I guess so, but its hard to tell. It was sitting for quite a while >> with no output. > > It should spin through the file names as they are copied. What was the > last output line before it hung? It never hung, it just took a very long time. This was over 2 weeks ago, and I'm afraid that I don't have the output any longer. Once I was satisfied that the upgrade was successful, and 9.2 was working ok, I deleted the log and 9.1 bits.