Обсуждение: How about putting distinct DB-schemas in extra DMBS instances

Hi,

we are fascinated about the point in time recovery feature. In order to have
that feature for each database(schema) extra and to make them disturb each
other even less, we would like to run several postmasters. So for each
DB-schema (3) there should be an extra DBMS running (in an own PGDATA dir).

Is that possible (of course, I think)?
But is that really what we want or will that make just more problems than
use?
Where's special care needed, Questions all over?
Answer anything.



Thanks.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We do this extensively at Afilias. It is an effective approach has the
associated cost of increasing the level of complexity of your systems.

I'll speak to the higher ups about posting the script we use to manage
multiple postgres instances in production.

- --
Andrew Hammond    416-673-4138    ahammond@ca.afilias.info
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
CB83 2838 4B67 D40F D086 3568 81FC E7E5 27AF 4A9A


KÖPFERL Robert wrote:
| Hi,
|
| we are fascinated about the point in time recovery feature. In order
to have
| that feature for each database(schema) extra and to make them disturb each
| other even less, we would like to run several postmasters. So for each
| DB-schema (3) there should be an extra DBMS running (in an own PGDATA
dir).
|
| Is that possible (of course, I think)?
| But is that really what we want or will that make just more problems than
| use?
| Where's special care needed, Questions all over?
| Answer anything.
|
|
|
| Thanks.
|
| ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
| TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCJ2wIgfzn5SevSpoRAppNAKCNJZl9hIYR2Emaxozu4cxNeWtNzQCdEb2I
XwK5c8PeHYDxPibcCPWsJdQ=
=s51R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----