Обсуждение: [admin] 32mb scsi system
hi, Is it possible to run postgreql on redhat 7.3/9.0 32mb 1gb scsi system? without x of course. thanks
Am 2004-07-02 17:00:09, schrieb Paul Gimpelj: >hi, >Is it possible to run postgreql on redhat 7.3/9.0 32mb 1gb scsi system? >without x of course. > >thanks I think, with RedHat a little bit to much for the memory... Exept you know, how to strip down this pig. I use Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 with a postgresql Backport from unstable and it was running on a P1/200 with 2 x 16 MByte EDO and 2 x 8 MByte EDO and it was working fine. Because you have only a 1 GB HDD I asume you have not very much traffic and I think, it will work. Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Вложения
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 17:00:09 -0400, Paul Gimpelj <pgimpelj@sympatico.ca> wrote: > hi, > Is it possible to run postgreql on redhat 7.3/9.0 32mb 1gb scsi system? > without x of course. I have run Postgres on Redhat 6.x with only 32MB of memory. It was awfully slow though. Your main problem is going to be fitting in Redhat, not Postgres.
Am 2004-07-03 01:44:47, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: >On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 17:00:09 -0400, > Paul Gimpelj <pgimpelj@sympatico.ca> wrote: >> hi, >> Is it possible to run postgreql on redhat 7.3/9.0 32mb 1gb scsi system? >> without x of course. > >I have run Postgres on Redhat 6.x with only 32MB of memory. It was awfully >slow though. Your main problem is going to be fitting in Redhat, not >Postgres. This is why I have sugested Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 It is powerful, small and you can get backports for it. Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)