FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries
От
Andrew - Supernews
Тема
FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries
Дата
Msg-id
slrnefp5c0.2ea3.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net
Список
Дерево обсуждения
FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com>
Re: FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>
Re: FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>
Picking out a specific point from the thread on prepared queries: Currently, the handling of Parse/Bind on the unnamed statement seems to go like this: - Parse on the unnamed statement does analysis and rewriting but does not plan, storing the query in a special memory context dedicated to the unnamed statement - Bind on the unnamed statement plans the query (using the supplied parameters) and stores the plan back in the unnamed statement's context I believe this could usefully (and transparently to clients) be changed so that Bind on the unnamed statement does _not_ store the plan back in the unnamed statement's context, but instead produces a plan which is only used _for that specific portal_. Thus, it would promote the parameters to constants before planning, knowing that the plan could only be run once; this would, I believe, allow the planner to produce a plan that was equivalent to that of a non-parameterized query. This would hopefully remove all cases where it is currently necessary to use PQexec rather than PQexecParams, such as where parameterized limits, immutable functions of parameters, partial indexes etc. are involved. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления