Re: [GENERAL] Unable to connect to Postgresql

On 04/07/2017 07:45 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 05:35 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 04/07/2017 05:03 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
>
>>>>> Running on Fedora 25 with SELinux in PERMISSIVE mode.  The audit log
>>>>> shows no hits on Postgresql.
>
>>> My going in position was/still is, that this is a SELinux security
>>> problem
>>> but I am finding SELinux to be the most opaque and badly documented
>>> software
>>> that I have ever had to deal with, which is why it is running in
>>> permissive
>>> mode at the moment.
>>
>> Well what I know about SELinux would fit in the navel of a flea(tip of
>> the hat to David Niven), so I can not be of much help there. The reason
>> I am returned this thread to the list, there are folks that do
>> understand it.
>
> If SELinux is running in permissive I don't see how it could be at fault
> for your issue. Did you verify that (getenforce)?
>
>>> --------------------------
>>> [Fri Apr 07 17:03:28.597101 2017] [php7:warn] [pid 1797:tid
>>> 140599445419776] [client 192.168.1.10:45127] PHP Warning:
>>> pg_connect(): Unable to connect to PostgreSQL server: could not
>>> connect to server: No such file or directory\n\tIs the server running
>>> locally and
>>> accepting\n\tconnections on Unix domain socket
>>> "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"? in /httpd/iliffe/testfcgi.php on line
>>> 121 ----------------------------
>
> This might be a silly question, but is PHP running on the same server as
> Postgres?

To add to this, previously you mentioned:

"Also, using the on board firewall (firewalld) to provide a secondary 
domain where the actual business processes run. "

What exactly does that mean?

>
> HTH,
>
> Joe
>


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com