Re: Problems with autovacuum
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: Problems with autovacuum
Дата
Msg-id
dcc563d10905250915u3fb94801o82fd4171139d7c86@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Problems with autovacuum (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Problems with autovacuum Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz.jagiello@gforces.pl>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz.jagiello@gforces.pl>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz.jagiello@gforces.pl>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz.jagiello@gforces.pl>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz.jagiello@gforces.pl>
Re: Problems with autovacuum Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>
2009/5/25 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz : > 2009/5/25 Scott Marlowe : > >> >> So, in 2000 databases, there's only an average of 2 relations per db >> and 102 dead rows? Cause that's all you got room for with those >> settings. >> >> Whats the last 20 or so lines of vacuum verbose as run by a superuser say? > > according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html > max_fsm_relations applies only to tables and indices, and it says "in > database", so I presume that means per database. In which case, those > settings are ok. > It would be nice, to see if vacuum actually complains about it. The docs say: "These parameters control the size of the shared free space map," Key word being shared.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления