AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem
Дата
Msg-id
dcc563d10905121147n51ad355aw9132dddfb6f0a133@mail.gmail.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Anyone on the list had a chance to benchmark the Nehalem's yet? I'm primarily wondering if their promise of performance from 3 memory channels holds up under typical pgsql workloads. I've been really happy with the behavior of my AMD shanghai based server under heavy loads, but if the Nehalems much touted performance increase translates to pgsql, I'd like to know.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
