Re: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery
Дата
Msg-id dcc563d10708220847ydc2e90dk8d7e98462fc99c22@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery  ("Dmitry Koterov" <dmitry@koterov.ru>)
Список pgsql-general
On 8/22/07, Dmitry Koterov <dmitry@koterov.ru> wrote:
> Hello.
> You see, 50M block was fsynced for 0.25 s.
>
> The question is: how to solve this problem and make fsync run with no delay.
> Seems to me that controller's internal write cache is not used (strange,
> because all configuration options are fine), but how to check it? Or, maybe,
> there is another side-effect?

I would suggest that either the controller is NOT configured fine, OR
there's some bug in how the OS is interacting with it.

What options are there for this RAID controller, and what are they set
to?  Specifically, the writeback / writethru type options for the
cache, and it might be if it doesn't preoprly detect a battery backup
module it refuses to go into writeback mode.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dmitry Koterov"
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery
Следующее
От: "Ed L."
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Converting non-null unique idx to pkey