Re: Orphan page in _bt_split
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split
Дата
Msg-id
aLZ1tnOQCRfepByH@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split (Peter Geoghegan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Константин Книжник <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Orphan page in _bt_split Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I remember that when I worked on what became commit 9b42e71376 back in > 2019 (which fixed a similar problem caused by the INCLUDE index > patch), Tom suggested that we do things this way defensively (without > being specifically aware of the _bt_getbuf hazard). That does seem > like the best approach. > > I'm a little bit worried about the added overhead of allocating an > extra BLCKSZ buffer for this. I wonder if it would make sense to use > BLCKSZ arrays of char for both of the temp pages. Hmm. Yes, the allocation makes me a bit uneasy. Or it would be possible to just use a PGAlignedBlock here? That's already used in some code paths for page manipulations, forcing alignment. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: shveta malik
Дата: