Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 10:20 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Also, is there a chance this is going to be back-patched? I guess it
> would be enough if the ugprade target is v17 so it is less of a concern,
> but it would be nice if people with millions of large objects are not
> stuck until they are ready to ugprade to v17.

It is a quite invasive patch, and it adds new features (pg_restore in
bigger transaction patches), so I think this is not for backpatching,
desirable as it may seem from the usability angle.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe