Re: reindexing an invalid index should not use ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:33:33PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 03:17:12PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> The "cannot" part of the message is also inaccurate, and it's not clear to me
>>> why we have this specific restriction at all.  REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY
>>> accepts such indexes, so I doubt it's an implementation gap.
>> 
>> If you would reword that, what would you change?
> 
> I'd do "skipping reindex of invalid index \"%s.%s\"".  If one wanted more,

In line with vacuum.c, that sounds like a good idea at the end.

> errhint("Use DROP INDEX or REINDEX INDEX.") would fit.

I'm OK with this suggestion as well.
--
Michael