You know,
There are three big threads going on in the list now:
A/ Tablespaces
B/ Backing up the database
C/ Getting people unsubscribed because of OLD DATA being restored.
Methinks that 'C' demonstrates the need for 'B'. If the database for subscribers had been
regularly backed up or was part of a journaling system, the subscriber database would not
have such OLD DATA in it. Having the database capable of having a backup EASILY and
AUTOMATICALLY, which is what 'B' is about, would have prevented 'C'
1/28/2003 11:05:16 AM, Will Lowe <harpo@thebackrow.net> wrote:
>> Having just started receiving the list without actually subscribing, I
>
>Interesting, the same thing happened to me. I figured I must've
>subscribed a long time ago and recently botched a procmail rule or
>something, but if this has happened to others tooo ...
>
>--
>
> thanks,
>
> Will
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>