Re: set constraints docs page
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: set constraints docs page |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.56.0308190949220.4847@krusty.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: set constraints docs page ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: set constraints docs page
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > > > It's a constraint name. IIRC, it happens to affect all such named > > > constraints currently. We should probably allow <tablename>.<constraint> > > > (and <schema>.<tablename>.<constraint>) as well. Too late for 7.4, but > > > this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections. > > > > I object. > > Thanks for the helpful objection. To what do you object specifically and > why? I object to creating gratuitous incompatibilities with the SQL standard, which will obstruct legitimate features down the road. The SQL standard says it is <schema>.<constraint>. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: