Re: set constraints docs page

Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> > > It's a constraint name.  IIRC, it happens to affect all such named
> > > constraints currently. We should probably allow .
> > > (and ..) as well. Too late for 7.4, but
> > > this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections.
> >
> > I object.
>
> Thanks for the helpful objection.  To what do you object specifically and
> why?

I object to creating gratuitous incompatibilities with the SQL standard,
which will obstruct legitimate features down the road.  The SQL standard
says it is ..

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net