Re: /contrib/retep to gborg

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Peter Mount
Тема
Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0210201010250.2209-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: /contrib/retep to gborg Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com>
Re: /contrib/retep to gborg Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Dave Page wrote:

> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg 
> > 
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian  writes:
> > > I am concerned that removing them may cause instability, 
> > particularly 
> > > in some of the java build scripts.  That's why I am suggesting not 
> > > doing it during beta.
> > 
> > Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC 
> > driver.  As long as JDBC is in the main distro, I think we 
> > should leave contrib/retep there too.
> > 
> > There was some talk of moving JDBC to gborg, but I'm not sure 
> > what the plan is, if any.
> 
> Marc asked me to sort it along with some other things, but when I spoke
> to Barry he didn't want to move. I passed it back to Marc.

I did say to Marc about removing contrib/retep several months ago, as more 
up to date versions have been on sourceforge for almost a year now.

I agree with Bruce about the build scripts, but suggest once everything is 
done, to remove them.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
peter@retep.org.uk
http://www.retep.org.uk/Tel/Fax: +44 (0) 1622 749439 Mobile: +44 (0) 7903 155887 US Fax: 1 435 304 5165
US Voice: 1 435 304 5165



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
FAQ