Re: Documentation DTD

Rod Taylor writes:

> Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2?

Not sure if we should do this now.  We're approaching the time where
people should be writing documentation, not having to refiddle their
carefully crafted DocBook installations.  We're not going to realize any
immediate benefits anyway.

> What it buys is a number of useful tags, SVGs and probably more
> importantly for the future, xsl and fop support which will probably be
> important in the future.  OpenJade hasn't had a new release in quite a
> long time -- not to say work isn't needed.

The last release was in January.

> Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML
> compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future.

Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate.  I look forward to it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net