Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
scott.marlowe
Тема
Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.33.0309190949180.14562-100000@css120.ihs.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL "Gregory S. Williamson" <gsw@globexplorer.com>
Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "scott.marlowe"  writes:
> > > ... Being honest and fair will win 
> > > hearts and minds, and when they need the Saturn 4 instead of the Estes
> > > rocket, they'll remember who to come to.
> > 
> > I like this analogy, though maybe you've overstretched.  Perhaps:
> > 
> > MySQL = Estes.  Put in InnoDB, and you have a D engine ... but it's
> > still a model rocket.
> > 
> > Postgres = Titan II.  Can boost LEO missions or small interplanetary
> > probes.  Never mind its ICBM heritage ;-)
> 
> All US (government) and Soviet/Russian rockets have ICBM roots.
> 
> > Oracle = Saturn IV.  Can take you to the moon ... if you can afford
> > the price tag.
> 
> What's a Saturn IV?  Do you mean the Saturn V?

http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm50.htm

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От:
Дата:
FAQ