Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released)
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released)
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.30.0201290008390.688-200000@peter.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released) Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released) Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Lamar Owen writes: > Yes. I still haven't gotten a good answer as to a good development > environment for the java build. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html might be a good place to start. > > * You're defining PGLIB in the bash profile. PGLIB doesn't do anything. > > As of? It's been unnecessary since 7.0. Beginning with 7.2 it's officially useless. > > Using `pidof postmaster` is wrong. There could be other postmasters > > running just fine. Should use the lock file, or not care because the > > postmaster or pg_ctl can handle this just fine. > > In this RPM incarnation there is the assumption that only one postmaster is > running. This will change once multiple config files are easier.... :-) But what's really wrong about it is that if the admin shuts down the "official" postgresql service, he inadvertently kills of all users' postmasters as well. > > * What happened to the contrib handling patch? > > * What is going to happen to NLS? > > It's going to be integrated, if I can remember to apply the patch you sent. > I would appreciate patches against the current release as opposed to your > personal development spec file. Got a point there. ;-) Updated NLS patch attached. I'll see about updating the contrib patch soon. Contrib isn't so important, but it'd be a shame to ship without NLS. TIA. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления