RE: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique.
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
RE: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique.
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.GSO.4.02A.10004270944221.23225-100000@Duva.DoCS.UU.SE
Ответ на
RE: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique. (Hiroshi Inoue)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique. Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com>
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > PostgreSQL's SERIALIZABLE isolation level would allow both inserts. > READ COMMITED isolation level wouldn't allow A's inserts. > > As I mentioned in another posting,PostgreSQL's SERIALIZABLE > isolation level isn't completely serializable and it's same as Oracle. > Probably Vadim refers to this incomplete serializability somewhere > in documentation. > It seems almost impossible to implement complete serializability > under MVCC without using table level locking. I love MVCC much > more than theoretically beautiful complete serializability. Given that Postgres correctly recognizes concurrent updates and aborts one of the transactions, how difficult would it be to do the same for inserts? -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления