Re: CoC [Final v2]
От
David E. Wheeler
Тема
Re: CoC [Final v2]
Дата
Msg-id
DE1EB4AE-6B17-4D17-ADB0-221EE8049BCF@justatheory.com
Ответ на
Re: CoC [Final v2] (Christophe Pettus)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] S McGraw <smcg4191@mtneva.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] S McGraw <smcg4191@mtneva.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Jan Danielsson <jan.m.danielsson@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote: > What is missing from this, first and foremost, is a reporting and resolution mechanism. If someone feels the CoC has been violated, who do they talk to? How does that person or entity resolve things? What confidentiality promises are made? I think that’s planned for a separate document, to be linked. But it need to be put in place at the same time, IME. Otherwise the CoC on its own has no teeth. Best, David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления