Re: CoC [Final v2]
От
David E. Wheeler
Тема
Re: CoC [Final v2]
Дата
Msg-id
ACA85E24-37D5-4FC8-AD5A-51B99E17D55C@justatheory.com
Ответ на
Re: CoC [Final v2] (Joshua D. Drake)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] S McGraw <smcg4191@mtneva.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] S McGraw <smcg4191@mtneva.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Jan Danielsson <jan.m.danielsson@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Re: CoC [Final v2] "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
On Jan 24, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > In retrospect I revoke my support of this idea entirely. It just isn't our jurisdiction. If doesn't happen in our yard then it isn't our business. Then know that the current draft of the CoC is easily interpreted as giving shelter to abusers. > I would also note that this document isn't going to be the end all of enforcement. Ultimately -core has the final say. -Core can determine on its own if it wants to enforce against a particular community member (with or without the CoC). Yep. And as Chrisophe pointed out, none of it will mean anything without an explicit and enforced policy for dealing with violations. Best, David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления