Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG

Поиск

Список

Период

Сортировка

От	Tristan Partin
Тема	Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Дата	3 июля 2023 г. 16:25:31
Msg-id	CTSOE3SS70RW.YE7NMLMQSQSO@gonk обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на	Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы	Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Список	pgsql-hackers

Дерево обсуждения

On Sat Jun 24, 2023 at 8:09 AM CDT, Joe Conway wrote:
> Although I have not looked yet, presumably we could have similar
> problems with plpython. I would like to get agreement on this approach
> against plperl before diving into that though.
>
> Thoughts?

I don't see anything immediately wrong with this. I think doing a
similar thing for plpython would make sense. Might make sense to CC any
other pl* maintainers too.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Вход в личный кабинет

Восстановление пароля

Подтверждение аккаунта

Изменение пароля

Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG