Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE

> Let's work towards fixes. I agree with your idea about introducing helpers
> and tracking all cases where we need to DooM. Would you like to propose a
> next patch version where you fix all know cases?

Sorry for the late response, I thought I already shared this patch and
now when I looked at this thread I realized that I didn't.

I attached a reworked patch that introduces 2 helper macros (functions
would be more complex with va args), and converts existing uses to
using them, dooming some scenarios, and extending the test coverage.