Re: c language functions
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: c language functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZjyyeR2uq=bFOjtAZpZ3_v83+ot64K_whWNTG=s8LfwQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: c language functions (Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: c language functions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I was checking inside my function the type of the second argument and > switching between the allowed types. > This way kind of does the same thing of many functions, doesn't it? Sure, except that it will also call your function when someone does my_int + text or my_int + bytea or my_int + box, which are surely a lot less sensible. It's probably a good idea to assume that if you make your type work like the existing types, it's more likely to end well than if you make it behave completely differently. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: