Re: table partioning performance

Colin,


On 1/6/07 8:37 PM, "Colin Taylor"  wrote:

> Hi there,  we've partioned a table (using 8.2) by day due to the 50TB of data
> (500k row size, 100G rows) we expect to store it in a year.
> Our performance on inserts and selects against the master table is
> disappointing, 10x slower (with ony 1 partition constraint) than we get  by
> going to the partioned table directly. Browsing the list I get the impression
> this just a case of too many partitions?  would be better off doing partitions
> of partitions ? 

Can you post an "explain analyze" of your query here so we can see what's
going on?

- Luke