Re: procpid?
От
Robert Haas
Тема
Re: procpid?
Дата
Msg-id
BANLkTin3Fed7dBdQH_qFZskcpC0=fJdP0g@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: procpid? (Greg Sabino Mullane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: procpid? Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: procpid? "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: procpid? Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Re: procpid? "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: procpid? "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: procpid? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: procpid? Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: procpid? Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: procpid? "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: procpid? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: procpid? Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: procpid? "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: procpid? Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: procpid? Rainer Pruy <Rainer.Pruy@Acrys.COM>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: procpid? Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Re: procpid? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: procpid? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: procpid? Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> For me, the litmus test is whether the change provides enough >> improvement that it outweighs the disruption when the user runs into >> it. > > For the procpid that started all of this, the clear answer is no. I'm > surprised people seriously considered making this change. It's a > historical accident: document and move on. I agree with you on this one... >> This is why I suggested a specific, useful, and commonly requested >> (to me at least) change to pg_stat_activity go along with this. > > +1. The procpid change is silly, but fixing the current_query field > would be very useful. You don't know how many times my fingers > have typed "WHERE current_query <> ''" ...but I'm not even excited about this. *Maybe* it's worth adding another column, but the problem with the existing system is *entirely* cosmetic. The string chosen here is unconfusable with an actual query, so we are talking here, as with the procpid -> pid proposal, ONLY about saving a few keystrokes when writing queries. That is a pretty thin justification for a compatibility break IMV. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления