Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
| От | Claudio Freire |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTimvHBwg88a-WDxhz-=Ts6Ry6wNApQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? (Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> wrote: > > "IMMUTABLE indicates that the function cannot modify the database and > always returns the same result when given the same argument values" > > Emphasis on "always". If the result of the function, given the same > argument values, can be different after a SET, then it doesn't qualify > for immutability. At least, that's my understanding. That's a ridiculous use of the word "Immutable" In any CS class, the timezone would be an implicit input to the function. So it would be immutable in *that* sense (it also takes timezone into consideration). Perhaps the optimizer should take contextual information that cannot change inside a query as input too.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: