Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?
От
Magnus Hagander
Тема
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?
Дата
Msg-id
BANLkTikMnvvYrG6GS_pLvL8p+P6hwG3_Fg@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? (Peter Eisentraut)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 19:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The pg_basebackup reference page is currently under "Client > Applications" [0]. I think it's more of a server application, because > it's what you'd run instead of initdb on the server. Should it be moved > to the "Server Applications" section? Not sure I buy that argument. pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore are under client applications. They're something you run *alongside* initdb and not instead, sure.. But they're all backup tools. And normally you *don't* necessarily run pg_basebackup instead of initdb. That is just one usecase - the one of setting up a clone or a replication slave. If you're using it to just take a base backup (which is what it's named for), it's not done instead of initdb... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата: