Re: performance on new linux box
От
Ryan Wexler
Тема
Re: performance on new linux box
Дата
Msg-id
AANLkTilCjMHlvYuHCu5Hf7nd4q5C50Cu5NhTS55F3St9@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: performance on new linux box (Kevin Grittner)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
performance on new linux box Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>
Re: performance on new linux box Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: performance on new linux box Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: performance on new linux box Eliot Gable <egable+pgsql-performance@gmail.com>
Re: performance on new linux box "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: performance on new linux box Eliot Gable <egable+pgsql-performance@gmail.com>
Re: performance on new linux box "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: performance on new linux box Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>
Re: performance on new linux box "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: performance on new linux box "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: performance on new linux boxeradmin(11983)i:
STATEMENT: update license set expires= '2010-06-15' where lic John Rouillard <rouilj@renesys.com>
Re: performance on new linux box Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Re: performance on new linux box Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>
Re: performance on new linux box Samuel Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>
Re: performance on new linux box Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>
Re: performance on new linux box Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: performance on new linux box Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: performance on new linux box Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>
Re: performance on new linux box "Pierre C" <lists@peufeu.com>
Thanks a lot for all the comments. The fact that both my windows box and the old linux box both show a massive performance improvement over the new linux box seems to point to hardware to me. I am not sure how to test the fsync issue, but i don't see how that could be it.
The raid card the server has in it is:
3Ware 4 Port 9650SE-4LPML RAID Card
Looking it up, it seems to indicate that it has BBU
The only other difference between the boxes is the postgresql version. The new one has 8.4-2 from the yum install instructions on the site:
http://yum.pgrpms.org/reporpms/repoview/pgdg-centos.html
Any more thoughts?
The raid card the server has in it is:
3Ware 4 Port 9650SE-4LPML RAID Card
Looking it up, it seems to indicate that it has BBU
The only other difference between the boxes is the postgresql version. The new one has 8.4-2 from the yum install instructions on the site:
http://yum.pgrpms.org/reporpms/repoview/pgdg-centos.html
Any more thoughts?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> If you can post some of your queries, there are a lot of brightSure, but the original post was because the brand new server class
> people on this discussion list that can probably help you solve
> your bottleneck
machine was performing much worse than the single-drive desktop
machine *on the same queries*, which seems like an issue worthy of
investigation independently of what you suggest.
-Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления