Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept
От
Greg Stark
Тема
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept
Дата
Msg-id
AANLkTikAXop_9dqQeVzC-NfeY0hpHTwCPjJPMTAsavmM@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Per-column collation, proof of concept Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > The problem with not doing that is it breaks hashing --- hash joins and > hash aggregation being the real pain points. > > citext works around this in a rather klugy fashion by decreeing that two > strings are equal iff their str_tolower() conversions are bitwise equal. > So it can hash the str_tolower() representation. But that's kinda slow > and it fails in the general case anyhow, I think. I think the general equivalent would be to call strxfrm and hash the result of that. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления