Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
От
Gregory Stark
Тема
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Дата
Msg-id
87y73qgc8a.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Ответ на
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. (Alvaro Herrera)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich@gmail.com>
"Alvaro Herrera" writes: > Hmm, if we do that, how would the system resolve something like this? > > select 1000 + 1000 Well we have the same problem with 'foo' || 'bar'. The question I think is whether the solution there scales to having two different fallback types. > There would be no clue as to what + operator to pick, since both > operands are unknown. This is in fact what happens today with > > alvherre=# select '100' + '100'; > ERROR: operator is not unique: unknown + unknown at character 14 > HINT: Could not choose a best candidate operator. You might need to add explicit type casts. > STATEMENT: select '100' + '100'; Perhaps we could kill two birds with one stone... -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Hiroshi Saito
Дата:
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата: