Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?

Antonin Houska  wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera  wrote:
> 
> > > Is your plan to work on it soon or should I try to write a draft patch? (I
> > > assume this is for PG >= 18.)
> > 
> > I don't have plans for it, so if you have resources, please go for it.
> 
> The first version is attached. The actual feature is in 0003. 0004 is probably
> not necessary now, but I haven't realized until I coded it.

The mailing list archive indicates something is wrong with the 0003
attachment. Sending it all again, as *.tar.

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com