Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends
От
Antonin Houska
Тема
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends
Дата
Msg-id
6236.1552379790@localhost
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Suggestions on message transfer among backends Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Andy Fan wrote: > I just don't know why shm_mq is designed to single-reader & single-writer. shm_mq was implemented as a part of infrastructure for parallel query processing. The leader backend launches multiple parallel workers and sets up a few queues to communicate with each. One queue is used to send request (query plan) to the worker, one queue is there to receive data from it, and I think there's one more queue to receive error messages. -- Antonin Houska https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления