Re: Database-level collation version tracking

On 11.02.22 13:51, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>>> I'm wondering why you changed this function to return an ObjectAddress rather
>>> than an Oid?  There's no event trigger support for ALTER DATABASE, and the rest
>>> of similar utility commands also returns Oid.
>>
>> Hmm, I was looking at RenameDatabase() and AlterDatabaseOwner(), which
>> return ObjectAddress.
> 
> Apparently I managed to only check AlterDatabase and AlterDatabaseSet, which
> both return an Oid.  Maybe we could also update those two to also return an
> ObjectAddress, for consistency?

I have committed this patch.

I didn't address the above issue.  I looked at it a bit, but I also 
found other (non-database) object types that had a mix of different 
return types.  It's not clear to me what this is all supposed to mean. 
If no one is checking the return, they should really all be turned into 
void, IMO.  Maybe this should be a separate discussion.