Re: Database-level collation version tracking

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:55:19AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have committed this patch.

Great!  Do you plan to send a rebased version of the ICU default collation
soon or should I start looking at the current v4?

> I didn't address the above issue.  I looked at it a bit, but I also found
> other (non-database) object types that had a mix of different return types.
> It's not clear to me what this is all supposed to mean. If no one is
> checking the return, they should really all be turned into void, IMO.  Maybe
> this should be a separate discussion.

Agreed.