Re: encode/decode support for base64url

> On 16 Jul 2026, at 15:36, David E. Wheeler  wrote:
> 
> On Jul 16, 2026, at 09:19, Daniel Gustafsson  wrote:
> 
>> During postcommit review for the upcoming v19 release I realized that this
>> introduced a slight regression in the truncation rules for plain base64.  The
>> checks for padding must check the format to make sure it's a base64url, as per
>> the attached.
> 
> +1, though it’d be nice to have a base64 variant that didn’t require trailing `=`s. Or one that could omit the newlines. Not for now, of course.

Pushed, thanks for review!

--
Daniel Gustafsson