Re: New warning code for missing FROM relations

>
>> Is is worth adding yet another setting, eg. set sql92=strict, which would
>> disallow such flagrant breaches of the standard? Maybe it could even be set
>> as the default in template1? I understand that breaking legacy code is a
>> bad idea, so the warning is a good step, but I would prefer an error if I
>> ever write such a statement.
>
>I am concerned about overloading the SET command.  Seems we should just
>agree on a behavior.
>

Then make it an option at build time.



----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: +61-03-5367 7422            |                 _________  \
Fax: +61-03-5367 7430            |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/