Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR
От | Uriy Zhuravlev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2294424.J96ZOUA4JB@dinodell обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 18 May 2015 10:21:10 Tom Lane wrote: > There are fairly significant reasons why we have not done this, based > on the difficulty of updating existing cached plans that might have > incidentally depended on those operator properties during creation. > Perhaps it's all right to simply ignore such concerns, but I would like > to see a defense of why. Then need to prohibit the use of shells operators (stub operators) to create self-linkage. Implicitly changing commutators and negators working for a long time through the shell operators. > On a more practical level, please change the syntax so that it does > not require making all those things into keywords. Do you say about CREATE OPERATOR like syntax? Thanks. -- Uriy Zhuravlev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: