Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Joe Conway
Тема
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH
Дата
Msg-id
21dca872-1270-4c17-9622-b071c9a1c265@joeconway.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
On 6/4/25 19:35, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 3:44 AM Joe Conway  wrote:
>> If you go from anything pre-glibc-2.21 to post-glibc-2.21 I think you
>> will find that even with the same data files you get a different sort.
>> The same patch that caused the performance regression [1] (still present
>> in up to date glibc) also cause changes in sort order via C code alone.

> Finding more cases probably involves running something a little like
> Jeremy's torture tests across a huge gallery of versions and
> combinations of cross-version recompiled definitions.  Or something
> like that...

Sounds like great fun!

;-)

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
FAQ