Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Nathan Bossart
Тема
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases
Дата
Msg-id
20240305022225.GA3375165@nathanxps13
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> rebased

I saw that this thread was referenced elsewhere [0], so I figured I'd take
a fresh look.  From a quick glance, I'd say 0001 and 0002 are pretty
reasonable and could probably be committed for v17.  0003 probably requires
some more attention.  If there is indeed interest in these changes, I'll
try to spend some more time on it.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/E0D2F0CE-D27C-49B1-902B-AD8D2427F07E%40yandex-team.ru

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
FAQ